Tuesday, October 15, 2013

China's creaking export model: James Saft


By James Saft


(Reuters) - That creaking sound you hear just might be the Chinese export-driven economy model about to break.


While most of the world's attention is focused on the interminable and badly sung opera in Washington, China just released a set of data that indicate a serious slowing in demand for its products, particularly from its emerging market trading partners.


Chinese exports in September fell 0.3 percent from a year ago, customs officials said. While demand for Chinese products flagged in the European Union, the main culprit seems to have been emerging markets, which have been hit hard by slowing capital flows. Exports to Southeast Asia fell to a 17-month low, while those to South Africa were also hit hard.


Emerging markets had a hard summer, as expectations, now reversed, that the Federal Reserve would slow its purchases of bonds made borrowing money internationally more difficult.


And yet, despite the fall in exports, the rest of China's economy, which is still predicated on demand from abroad, is carrying on as if nothing has changed. Imports were sharply higher in the month, especially of the sorts of raw materials needed for export industries and to invest in infrastructure to support more exports. Credit creation also rose, with doubtless much of it going to support imports and property investment.


Imports of crude oil and iron ore set a fresh record in September, while copper shipments jumped 18 percent to set an 18-month high.


For decades, China's economic model has been relatively simple: use a lower wage base to drive exports and re-invest most of the profits into the infrastructure and factories needed to create yet more exports. Though this approach worked brilliantly for years, there were two big longer-term weaknesses with this plan. Both of them may be coming into play just about now, which would both explain decreasing demand for Chinese goods and make it more difficult for China to cope.


Wage growth in China has far outpaced inflation, making it less competitive. Wages in Chinese manufacturing have more than tripled in 8 years, while the supply of rural workers streaming to cities has slowed. Boston Consulting Group sees more so-called onshoring of jobs back to the United States, driven by wages, automation and energy and transportation costs.


The paired weakness is in China's consumer economy, which has been small and has suffered as the economy remains focused on investment, often in houses, for which there is little natural demand.


CHINA'S PLAYBOOK


It is unclear if slowing exports are being driven by cyclical trends, like weakness in emerging markets, or secular ones, like the migration of manufacturing. September's figures may also look worse than they were due to a crackdown this year on phantom imports, which have been a popular way for companies wanting to bring money into the country to skirt Chinese capital controls.


If there is a sustained fall in demand for China's products, its options may be somewhat limited. Given the centrality of investment and exports to China's economy, the government has a track record of reacting forcefully to slow-downs. The tactics include easing monetary conditions, which stimulate loans and investment even in the absence of strong demand for the end product.


But such easing may be a bit difficult right now.


China's annual consumer inflation rate rose to a seven-month high of 3.1 percent in September, driven by food inflation, in particular vegetables. While this was driven by weather, and thus may subside, it will serve to limit the central bank's ability to loosen conditions.


In some ways, the biggest issue isn't limitations on government stimulus if China needs it. One of the advantages of a single-party state with strong control over banking is that the government can always foment credit growth.


The problem instead is what happens if exports don't come back, if change is long-term and mostly in one direction. That will put a lot of pressure on China, not least because a lot of the investment there since the great financial crisis has been of very low quality.


It is not simply empty cities filled with "investment" apartments. It is everything from the cost and wastefulness of infrastructure investment to low-yielding research and development.


An IMF study from 2012 estimated that China's over-investment is equivalent to between 10-20 percent of annual output every year. (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/wp12277.pdf) Not only does that imply very, very low returns on investment, it almost certainly points to lower growth over time if, or rather when, China is forced to move away from its export model.


That story, when it happens, may make U.S. political dysfunction look like small potatoes in comparison.


(James Saft is a Reuters columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)


(At the time of publication, Reuters columnist James Saft did not own any direct investments in securities mentioned in this article. He may be an owner indirectly as an investor in a fund. For previous columns by James Saft, click on)



Source: http://news.yahoo.com/chinas-creaking-export-model-james-saft-041646521--sector.html
Similar Articles: walking dead   obamacare   lea michele   Hasnat Khan   Comic Con 2013  

Cards, Dodgers, Tigers, Bosox sport longtime logos

Tune in this week to watch Yasiel Puig or David Ortiz in high-def, then check out these throwbacks: Jackie Robinson stealing home in a grainy newsreel, Ted Williams swinging in a black-and-white photo.


See something familiar?


That flowing blue "Dodgers" script across the front of the jersey that followed them from Brooklyn. That pointy, ornate "B'' on the Red Sox cap.


Same style, now and then.


Pretty much true for the Cardinals and Tigers, too. The classic "birds on a bat" logo sported by Carlos Beltran and his St. Louis teammates, the Olde English "D'' worn by Miguel Cabrera and his Detroit pals — find a picture from the 1934 World Series between those teams and you'll recognize the jerseys.


In an era when clubs frequently change their look and often wear more than a dozen uniform combinations, kind of neat to see the four remaining playoff teams dressed up in duds that date back 70 years or so.


"They're all definitely the top jerseys in the game. You probably don't need to change them," Cardinals reliever Kevin Siegrist said.


"It's just the history of the game. It's crazy. These organizations have been around since when the game first started so it's awesome to have all these big teams in there. It's fun," he said.


There have been some changes, of course. The bat in the Cardinals logo is now yellow, rather than red or black from way back. The Tigers "D'' on the hat was orange at Fenway Park, instead of white.


Still, close enough.


"Uniforms have changed so much, it's nice to wear one that hasn't changed a lot," Red Sox infielder John McDonald said.


McDonald has put on plenty of them — he's played for seven teams in the majors, including Boston, Cleveland, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh this season alone.


"My dad used to take me to watch baseball games a lot, I'd go to New York, Boston, a lot of places. I really started to notice the older uniforms when I was in Pittsburgh earlier this year," he said.


And now, baseball's playoff club shares a bond.


"It's cool. There's a lot of tradition with the teams that are left and a lot of history. That makes it great for baseball," Cardinals second baseman Matt Carpenter said.


___


AP freelance writers Jeff Melnick, Ken Powtak and Calvin May contributed to this report.


Source: http://news.yahoo.com/cards-dodgers-tigers-bosox-sport-longtime-logos-150033798.html
Category: mrsa   survivor   Phillip Lim Target   aaron hernandez   Tim Hudson  

Sunday, October 13, 2013

(Cabbage) Heads Will Roll: How To Make A Food Network 'From Scratch'





According to journalist Allen Salkin, Emeril Lagasse initially opposed bringing Rachael Ray, pictured here in 2007, onto the Food Network – and, at first, Ray agreed with him. "You have this all wrong," she told executives, "I'm beer in a bottle; you guys are champagne."



Scott Gries/Getty Images


According to journalist Allen Salkin, Emeril Lagasse initially opposed bringing Rachael Ray, pictured here in 2007, onto the Food Network – and, at first, Ray agreed with him. "You have this all wrong," she told executives, "I'm beer in a bottle; you guys are champagne."


Scott Gries/Getty Images


Mario Batali, Guy Fieri and Rachael Ray are just a few of the stars the Food Network helped create. But what the network gave, it could also take away.



In From Scratch, author Allen Salkin takes an unsparing look at the network's progression from struggling cable startup to global powerhouse, and the people — Emeril Lagasse, Paula Deen — who rose and fell along the way.


Salkin tells NPR's Rachel Martin that while the network was intended for cooks, it wasn't run by them.


"They were not trying to spread the gospel of kale and of shallots," he says. "These were guys trying to make a media play and make some money."



Interview Highlights


On what cooking shows were like before the Food Network


It was this thing relegated to weekend mornings on PBS with Julia Child, obviously, pioneering the format in the '60s with The French Chef, and then in the '80s with The Frugal Gourmet and Martin Yan. And it really was sort of a ghetto of television. Nobody believed that anyone would ever want to watch this on primetime.


... Julia is a great figure and really showed the way to having some personality on food TV, but it was not being exploited. It fell to these cable TV pioneers to take a shot at it.


On the early, low-budget set for Mario Batali's show, Molto Mario


He was such a great host at first, telling these erudite stories about how he learned about a certain kind of ravioli in a certain village in Umbria, but there was no oven. So he would pretend to slide that tray of whatever he was making under the counter and stamp his foot on the floor to simulate an oven sound — which is, you know, great television.


On how Emeril Lagasse helped jump-start the network


Emeril was actually a guy from Fall River, Mass., and he had become famous because he sort of revolutionized and modernized Creole cuisine down in New Orleans. And he was first making appearances on the Nashville Network, and these producers down there basically pitched Emeril as a potential host.



... It was with Emeril Live eventually, his third show on the network, that he was really the first breakthrough star. He took the original Julia Child dump-and-stir, if you will, format and married it with this Tonight Show pizzazz of a monologue and a live band, and that was really the thing that started the Food Network on its way.


On the near-death of Emeril's "Bam!"





Allen Salkin is an investigative journalist who's hosted a video series for AOL's Slashfood blog and written for The New York Times.



Earl Wilson


Allen Salkin is an investigative journalist who's hosted a video series for AOL's Slashfood blog and written for The New York Times.


Earl Wilson


A character on [The Larry Sanders Show] used to say "Hey now!" all the time, and [Creative Director] Jonathan [Lynn] thought that Emeril's shtick with the "Bam!" and "Hey now!" and "Let's kick it up a notch!" was derivative, and so told him to kill the "Bam!" ... Can you imagine? It's like telling the Fonz not to say, "Eyyy." [Emeril won] because Emeril, in his restaurants in New Orleans, was already getting a little bit of feedback with people shouting "Bam!" back at him. He knew he was working.


On Emeril's departure


Emeril had been the biggest star on the network for 10 years, and the network had started seeing him as this aging quarterback who could no longer take them to the Super Bowl — especially starting in the early 2000s, with Top Chef competing against them on Bravo, and others. And the Food Network felt like his demographic — you know, it's always the same: His viewers are getting older, his ratings are going down a little, his program was more expensive. Ultimately, they treated him pretty shoddily. ... It really was the final, kind of, end of an era of this great star — who made the network, who was a chef, who was grounded in restaurant culture — being shown the door by a bunch of television executives.


On where the network stands today


If you look at it, their last breakthrough, household-name star was Guy Fieri, and he won, in 2006, [The] Next Food Network Star. So that's been seven years. ... In about 2002, 2003 this network was just generating household names: Barefoot Contessa, Giada De Lorentiis, Paula Deen. And they are no longer doing that. In fact, they no longer even have their own internal production; they're not making their own cooking shows anymore. The network, at its heart, used to literally smell like apple pie and baking chickens, and now they're doing what every other network is doing: They're sending executives to have meetings with production companies in L.A., trying to find the next Duck Dynasty.


On Paula Deen



The Paula Deen problem started before this N-word controversy, which came from the racial and sexual discrimination lawsuit against her and a deposition she gave. The problems she had started way back in 2001. Her agent had negotiated a deal where the network was not participating in any of her businesses. In other words, they have the American Idol model: You win American Idol, you've got to give part of your record contract back to the people who make American Idol. And that's what Food Network wants. They believe that their brand is so strong that they should take a cut of your cookbook sales, of your spatulas and everything else. They didn't get that from Paula so they were not really in business with her.


Secondly, the diabetes drug deal that she had made about a year and a half earlier, where the Queen of Butter and Sugar had all of a sudden admitted she had diabetes exactly at the time she was taking millions of dollars to endorse a diabetes drug, rather than before that. And none of her programming had been changed. The Food Network hired a crisis consultant company and was calling reporters on background and telling us, "We had nothing to do with this, this is outrageous," and really distancing the network from this. So she already had a few strikes against her.


At the same time, these stand-and-stir cooking shows that Paula was doing were losing viewers. And this, ultimately, was a network that is trying to expand channels into South Africa, Singapore, all over Asia. And so when the N-word controversy happened, she already had two strikes against her and her contract was up at exactly the wrong time.


Source: http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2013/10/13/231527991/-cabbage-heads-will-roll-how-to-make-a-food-network-from-scratch?ft=1&f=
Tags: st louis cardinals   suntrust   dexter   joe flacco   made in america  

Monday, July 1, 2013

wowza. will the US gov't forbid the troops from reading the washington post now?

NSA slides explain the PRISM data-collection program - The Washington Post

www.washingtonpost.com

Through a Top-Secret program authorized by federal judges working under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), the U.S. intelligence community can gain access to the servers of nine internet companies for a wide range of digital data. Documents describing the previously undisclosed progra...

Source: http://www.facebook.com/occupyeverywhere/posts/542282962474332

act of valor woody guthrie benson henderson 2012 dunk contest edgar vs henderson berkshire hathaway ufc 144

Edward Snowden: Has search for NSA leaker become a sideshow?

Edward Snowden: As the press and public focus on Snowden's location and where he may move next, some worry the former National Security Agency contractor is overshadowing the underlying debate over government collection of data.

By Sharon Cohen,?AP National Writer / June 29, 2013

Edward Snowden: A photographer takes picture of President Barack Obama and Edward Snowden held by pro-democractic legislator Gary Fan Kwok-wai during a news conference in Hong Kong. Some say the search for the former National Security Agency contractor who spilled government secrets has become distracting.

Kin Cheung/AP/File

Enlarge

Edward?Snowden's?continent-jumping, hide-and-seek game seems like the stuff of a pulp thriller ? a desperate man's drama played out before a worldwide audience trying to decide if he's a hero or a villain.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; // google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

But the search for the former National Security Agency contractor who spilled US secrets has become something of a distracting sideshow, some say, overshadowing the important debate over the government's power to seize the phone and Internet records of millions of Americans to help in the fight against terrorism.

"You have to be humble on day 1 to say, 'This isn't about me. This is about the information.'... I don't think he really anticipated the importance of making sure the focus initially was off him," says Mike Paul, president of MGP & Associates PR, a crisis management firm in New York. "Not only has he weakened his case, some would go as far as to say he's gone from hero to zero."

Snowden, he says, can get back on track by "utilizing whatever information he has like big bombs in a campaign," so the focus returns to the question of spying and not his life on the run.

Snowden's?disclosures about US surveillance to The Guardian newspaper and The Washington Post have created an uproar in Washington that shows no signs of fading.

A petition asking President Barack Obama to pardon?Snowden?has collected more than 123,000 signatures.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, meanwhile, has called?Snowden's?disclosure of top-secret information "an act of treason." And Republican House Speaker John Boehner is among those who've called?Snowden?a "traitor."

The president has dismissed the 30-year-old?Snowden?as a "hacker" and he had pledged that the US won't be scrambling military jets to snatch?Snowden?and return him to the US, where he faces espionage charges.

Snowden?is possibly holed up in the wing of a Russian airport hotel reserved for travelers in transit who don't have visas to enter Russia. He might be waiting to hear whether Ecuador, Iceland or another country might grant him asylum. He fled Hong Kong last weekend after being charged with violating American espionage laws.

Some say?Snowden?is losing ground in the battle for public opinion by cloaking his travels in secrecy, creating more interest in his efforts to elude US authorities than his allegations against the government.

By disappearing in Russia, he loses "access to rehabilitate himself in the public's mind," says William Weaver, a professor at the University of Texas at El Paso who has written about government secrecy.

"You have to keep selling yourself, if you will, and do it in a smart way so people don't get tired of you. ... His only hope was to hit a grand slam home run with the public and make it stick. For every hour that he's not doing something like that, he's in trouble."

Others say?Snowden's?personality is irrelevant and doesn't change his major argument ? that US intelligence agencies have lied about the scope of its surveillance of Americans.

Gene Healy, a vice president of the libertarian Cato Institute, recently wrote an essay denouncing pundits who've labeled?Snowden?a "grandiose narcissist" and a "total slacker." He maintains that the former contractor's revelations are all that matters. "The content of the message is far more important than the character of the messenger," he wrote in the Washington Examiner.

Healy said "the most disturbing" part of?Snowden's?disclosures was the massive amounts of data collected on citizens. "The potential abuse of that information represents a grave threat to American liberty and privacy regardless of?Snowden's?character and motivations," he wrote.

David Colapinto, general counsel at the National Whistleblowers Center, says it's not surprising?Snowden?has become an "easy target'" facing harsh criticism from those at the highest levels of government ? people "who have a bigger megaphone than he does."

"The name-calling and whatever may happen in the future ? we don't know what he's going to do," he adds. "We don't know what the government is going to do. ... It's pretty hard to pull out a crystal ball."

So far, America seems to be divided, according to polls taken in the first days after?Snowden's?leak of top-secret documents. Many people initially applauded the former contractor for exposing what they saw as government spying on ordinary Americans. Since then, though, government officials have responded with explanations of the program and congressional testimony attesting to the value of surveillance in thwarting terrorist attacks.

In one poll, a June 12-16 national survey by the Pew Research Center and USA Today, 49 percent of those surveyed said the release of classified information about the NSA program serves the public interest, while 44 percent found it harmful. For those under 30, the gap was dramatically larger. That group said it's good for the public by a 60-34 percent margin, according to the survey.

Still, 54 percent also said the government should pursue a criminal case against someone who leaked classified information about the program.

A second survey taken in that same five-day period found a similar split. The Washington Post-ABC news poll found that 43 percent support and 48 percent oppose criminally charging?Snowden. But the survey also reported that 58 percent of Americans support the NSA's sweeping surveillance program.

Snowden?has acknowledged taking highly classified documents about US surveillance and sharing the information with the papers in Britain and Washington. He also told the South China Morning Post that the NSA hacked Chinese cellphone companies to seek text message data.

At this point,?Snowden's?main job is to stay out of prison and he has both a "powerful narrative" and major disadvantages, says Eric Dezenhall, head of a crisis management firm in Washington.

"The biggest thing on the asset side is the concern people have about government surveillance ? it's very legitimate," Dezenhall says. "The weaknesses are having betrayed secrets he was entrusted with and the fact he ended up in these hostile countries. .... Public opinion doesn't move on nuance. (People think) You're a whistle-blower who's in Russia or China. So you think they have an answer to this problem? It's not very intelligent."

Gerald R. Shuster, a professor of political communication at the University of Pittsburgh, says if?Snowden?had remained in the US and "stood his ground, he would have remained more heroic" and lawyers would have lined up to represent him.

But if he's brought back to face charges and "he's shown in handcuffs, the aura of idealism is over," Shuster says. "He's more and more perceived as a criminal."

Colapinto, the lawyer for the whistle-blower group, says it's too soon to know how?Snowden's?plight will play out.

"This is like a moving river," he says. "We're maybe midstream. We don't know where this will end up. I think history will judge him as things develop. But we just don't know the end of the story."

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/tyT2_ARc6y8/Edward-Snowden-Has-search-for-NSA-leaker-become-a-sideshow

Mara Wilson Cullen Finnerty maria menounos Mermaids New Evidence Raspberry Pi memorial day stacy keibler

AIDS-HIV-TREATMENT

By Kate Kelland

LONDON (Reuters) - Doctors could save three million more lives worldwide by 2025 if they offer AIDS drugs to people with HIV much sooner after they test positive for the virus, the World Health Organisation said on Sunday.

While better access to cheap generic AIDS drugs means many more people are now getting treatment, health workers, particularly in poor countries with limited health budgets, currently tend to wait until the infection has progressed.

But in new guidelines aimed at controlling and eventually reducing the global AIDS epidemic, the U.N. health agency said some 26 million HIV-positive people - or around 80 percent of all those with the virus - should be getting drug treatment.

The guidelines, which set a global standard for when people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) should start antiretroviral treatment, were drawn up after numerous studies found that treating HIV patients earlier can keep them healthy for many years and also lowers the amount of virus in the blood, significantly cutting their risk of infecting someone else.

"We are raising the bar to 26 million people," said Gottfried Hirnschall, the WHO's HIV/AIDS department director.

"And this is not only about keeping people healthy and alive but also about blocking further transmission of HIV."

Some 34 million people worldwide have the HIV virus that causes AIDS and the vast majority of them live in poor and developing countries. Sub-Saharan Africa is by far the worst affected region.

But the epidemic - which has killed 25 million people in the 30 years since HIV was first discovered - is showing some signs of being turned around. The United Nations AIDS programme UNAIDS says deaths from the disease fell to 1.7 million in 2011, down from a peak of 2.3 million in 2005 and from 1.8 million in 2010.

Swift progress has also been made in getting more HIV patients into treatment, with 9.7 million people getting life-saving AIDS drugs in 2012, up from just 300,000 people a decade earlier, according to latest WHO data also published on Sunday.

Indian generics companies are leading suppliers of HIV drugs to Africa and to many other poor countries. Major Western HIV drugmakers include Gilead Sciences, Johnson & Johnson and ViiV Healthcare, which is majority-owned by GlaxoSmithKline.

"IRREVERSIBLE DECLINE"?

Margaret Chan, the WHO's director general, said the dramatic improvement in access to HIV treatment raised the prospect of the world one day being able to beat the disease.

"With nearly 10 million people now on antiretroviral therapy, we see that such prospects - unthinkable just a few years ago - can now fuel the momentum needed to push the HIV epidemic into irreversible decline," she said in a statement.

The WHO's guidelines encourage health authorities worldwide to start treatment in adults with HIV as soon as a key test known as a CD4 cell count falls to a measure of 500 cells per cubic millimetre or less.

The previous WHO standard was to offer treatment at a CD4 count of 350 or less, in other words when the virus has already started to damage the patient's immune system.

The guidelines also say all pregnant or breastfeeding women and all children under five with HIV should start treatment immediately, whatever their CD4 count, and that all HIV patients should be regularly monitored to assess their "viral load".

This allows health workers to check whether the medicines are reducing the amount of virus in the blood. It also encourages patients to keep taking their medicine because they can see it having positive results.

"There's no greater motivating factor for people to stick to their HIV treatment than knowing the virus is 'undetectable' in their blood," said Gilles van Cutsem, the medical coordinator in South Africa for the international medical humanitarian organisation M?decins Sans Fronti?res (MSF).

MSF welcomed the new guidelines but cautioned that the money and the political will to implement them was also needed.

"Now is not the time to be daunted but to push forward," MSF president Unni Karunakara said in a statement. "So it's critical to mobilise international support... including funding for HIV treatment programmes from donor governments."

The WHO's Hirnschall said getting AIDS drugs to the extra patients brought in by the new guidelines would require another 10 percent on top of the $22-$24 billion a year currently needed to fund the global fight against HIV and AIDS. (Editing by Gareth Jones)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/aids-hiv-treatment-090840548.html

2012 masters shroud of turin the borgias the masters warren sapp i robot the big c

Mandela still critical, Zuma says hopes he will leave hospital soon

JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) - Former South African president Nelson Mandela's condition remains "critical but stable" but the government hopes the 94-year-old anti-apartheid hero will be out of hospital soon, President Jacob Zuma said on Saturday.

"We hope that very soon he will be out of hospital," Zuma said at a televised press conference with visiting U.S. President Barack Obama. Mandela has been in hospital for three weeks for treatment for a recurring lung infection.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/mandela-still-critical-zuma-says-hopes-leave-hospital-110702592.html

lytro camera lytro camera andrew brietbart branson mo monkees songs rail gun harrisburg